1968 Singaporean general election
13 April 1968
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 58 seats in Parliament 30 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registered | 759,367[a] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Turnout | 91.83% ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Results by constituency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is part of a series on |
![]() |
|---|
|
|
General elections were held in Singapore on 13 April 1968 to elect all 58 members of Parliament. They were the third general elections since Singapore attained self-governance in 1959 and the first since gaining independence in 1965. The ruling People's Action Party (PAP), led by Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, won a landslide victory, securing all 58 seats in Parliament. Of these, 51 were uncontested, as opposition parties either failed to field candidates or withdrew altogether. As a result, the outcome of the elections was effectively determined before polling day.[1]
The political context of the elections was shaped by a weakened and fragmented opposition. Barisan Sosialis (BS), the main opposition party formed by former PAP members, had boycotted Parliament after independence and subsequently withdrew from electoral politics altogether, citing concerns over political repression and the use of the Internal Security Act (ISA) against dissenting voices. Other minor parties joined the boycott or were either inactive or lacked the organisational capacity to mount a significant challenge. The PAP, in turn, used its control over state institutions and media to reinforce its message of stability, development and national unity during a time of regional uncertainty.[2]
With a large number of uncontested seats, voter participation was drastically limited. Out of 759,367 registered voters, only 77,952 out of 84,883 voted with 65,812 going to the PAP, since ballots were cast in just seven contested constituencies. The remaining 51 seats were filled by walkovers. While this result was consistent with electoral rules, it highlighted the constrained political environment and the absence of meaningful electoral competition. This election marked the beginning of a prolonged period of de facto one-party rule by the PAP, during which the party could pursue their policies without opposition, setting the tone for Singapore's political trajectory in the decades that followed.[3]
Background
In 1968, Singapore was a young independent nation facing significant challenges, including economic underdevelopment, security concerns and social integration. The government focused on industrialising the economy, attracting foreign investment, and developing a strong military, particularly in response to the announcement of the British military withdrawal East of Suez by 1971. The government promoted civic nationalist policies such as bilingualism, National Service (NS) and ethnic integration to avoid the re-emergence of racial strife. Singapore was previously admitted into the United Nations (UN) in September 1965, joining the international community.
Boycott and arrests
During the late 1960s, some local politicians, particularly from the left-wing Barisan Sosialis (BS), were against Singapore's newly found sovereignty and boycotted Parliament, believing it to be impractical and ungenuine. BS boycotted the first session of Parliament which began on 8 December 1965, a few months after independence on 9 August. Its MPs also began resigning, leading to by-elections in 1966 and 1967, with eleven MPs resigning from Parliament in total. BS decided that their strategy to protest the "undemocratic acts" of the PAP was to carry their struggle outside of Parliament. One of these MPs, Chia Thye Poh, declared that the means of the struggle would be "street demonstrations, protest meetings and strikes".[4]
In response, the PAP government viewed these boycotts as "conducting pro-communist activities with the intention of causing a communist revolution". The government arrested some BS politicians under the Internal Security Act (ISA), including Chia. By 1968, the PAP had complete supermajority control of Parliament. The PAP would end up occupying all seats in Parliament until 1981.[5]
Campaign
The remnants of BS boycotted the elections, arguing that the parliamentary system in Singapore was "undemocratic" and that participation would legitimise what they viewed as an "authoritarian regime", and several opposition parties also heeded its call. On nomination day, the leaders of Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Singapura (PKMS), formerly the local branch of the United Malay National Organisation (UMNO), Ahmad Haji Taff, and the Singapore Chinese Party (SCP), formerly the local branch of the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA), Chng Boon Eng, turned up at the Elections Department (ELD) but did not file their nominations.[6]
Ultimately, the only political party other than the PAP that contested in the election were the Workers' Party (WP), albeit in only two seats at Jalan Kayu and Nee Soon. In addition, five independents contested in five different constituencies – Farrer Park, Geylang Serai, Kampong Ubi, Moulemein and Lee Kuan Yew's seat of Tanjong Pagar. As a result, with only seven contested seats out of 57, the PAP returned to power on nomination day (and the only one where it have a supermajority of walkovers), a feat which was later repeated again in 1991, 1997 and 2001. All seven contests were straight contests, a similar situation would not occur again until 2006. Walkovers in constituencies held by the PAP also became a recurring feature in every subsequent general election since independence, with exceptions being 2015 and 2020, where the two election saw every seats being contested.
The PAP winning every seat also became a recurring theme for four consecutive elections, which lasted until 1980. It was also the last general election in which the campaign period lasted for two months; for subsequent elections it was restricted to only 9 to 10 days.
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 8 February | Dissolution of 1st Parliament |
| 17 February | Nomination Day |
| 13 April | Polling day |
| 6 May | Opening of 2nd Parliament |
Electoral system
The 58 members of Parliament were elected in 58 single-member constituencies, an increase from 51 in the 1963 elections. The constituencies introduced or removed in the election, as well as constituencies with changes of boundaries, are shown on the table:
| Constituency | Changes |
|---|---|
| New Constituencies | |
| Alexandra | Carved out from Queenstown constituency |
| Bukit Ho Swee | Carved out from Delta constituency |
| Kampong Chai Chee | Carved out from Kampong Kembangan, Siglap and Tampines constituencies |
| Kampong Ubi | Carved out from Geylang Serai constituency |
| Katong | Carved out from Mountbatten constituency |
| MacPherson Potong Pasir |
Carved out from Aljunied constituency |
| Whampoa | Carved out from Kallang constituency |
| Defunct Constituencies | |
| Southern Islands | Absorbed to Jurong, Pasir Panjang and Telok Blangah constituencies |
Results
- PAP (86.7%)
- WP (4.02%)
- Independents (9.27%)
- 51 seats (PAP; uncontested) (89.5%)
- 7 seats (PAP; contested) (10.5%)
![]() | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Votes | % | +/– | Seats | +/– | |
| People's Action Party | 65,812 | 86.72 | +39.79 | 58 | +21 | |
| Workers' Party | 3,049 | 4.02 | +3.97 | 0 | 0 | |
| Independents | 7,033 | 9.27 | +8.10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75,894 | 100.00 | – | 58 | +7 | |
| Valid votes | 75,894 | 97.36 | ||||
| Invalid/blank votes | 2,058 | 2.64 | ||||
| Total votes | 77,952 | 100.00 | ||||
| Registered voters/turnout | 759,367 | 91.83 | ||||
| Source: Nohlen et al., Singapore Elections[a] | ||||||
By constituency
Out of the seven seats contested (all by only two candidates), three had winning margins of over 75%, with the losers forfeiting their deposit. The result for Tanjong Pagar (94% to 6%) remains the biggest winning margin and percentage obtained to date.
| Constituency | Electorate | Party | Candidate | Votes | % | Swing | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra | 13,317 | People's Action Party | Wong Lin Ken | Uncontested | ||||
| Aljunied | 14,472 | People's Action Party | Mohamad Ghazali bin Ismail | Uncontested | ||||
| Anson | 8,764 | People's Action Party | Perumal Govindaswamy | Uncontested | ||||
| Bras Basah | 9,718 | People's Action Party | Ho See Beng | Uncontested | ||||
| Bukit Ho Swee | 17,735 | People's Action Party | Seah Mui Kok | Uncontested | ||||
| Bukit Merah | 19,319 | People's Action Party | Lim Guan Hoo | Uncontested | ||||
| Bukit Panjang | 17,893 | People's Action Party | Pathmanaban Selvadurai | Uncontested | ||||
| Bukit Timah | 16,769 | People's Action Party | Chor Yeok Eng | Uncontested | ||||
| Cairnhill | 12,287 | People's Action Party | Lim Kim San | Uncontested | ||||
| Changi | 15,594 | People's Action Party | Sim Boon Woo | Uncontested | ||||
| Chua Chu Kang | 12,879 | People's Action Party | Tang See Chim | Uncontested | ||||
| Crawford | 7,190 | People's Action Party | Low Yong Nguan | Uncontested | ||||
| Delta | 17,715 | People's Action Party | Chan Choy Siong | Uncontested | ||||
| Farrer Park | 10,290 | People's Action Party | Lee Chiaw Meng | 7,826 | 84.91 | 69.82 | ||
| Independent | Madai Puthan Damodaran Nair | 1,391 | 15.09 | N/A | ||||
| Geylang East | 16,185 | People's Action Party | Ho Cheng Choon | Uncontested | ||||
| Geylang Serai | 12,741 | People's Action Party | Rahmat bin Kenap | 9,363 | 83.01 | 66.02 | ||
| Independent | Darus bin Shariff | 1,916 | 16.99 | N/A | ||||
| Geylang West | 14,609 | People's Action Party | Yong Nyuk Lin | Uncontested | ||||
| Havelock | 11,049 | People's Action Party | Lim Soo Peng | Uncontested | ||||
| Hong Lim | 10,388 | People's Action Party | Lee Khoon Choy | Uncontested | ||||
| Jalan Besar | 11,400 | People's Action Party | Chan Chee Seng | Uncontested | ||||
| Jalan Kayu | 12,878 | People's Action Party | Hwang Soo Jin | 9,581 | 82.30 | 64.60 | ||
| Workers' Party | Sum Chong Meng | 2,060 | 17.70 | N/A | ||||
| Joo Chiat | 12,335 | People's Action Party | Yeoh Ghim Seng | Uncontested | ||||
| Jurong | 11,445 | People's Action Party | Ho Kah Leong | Uncontested | ||||
| Kallang | 9,309 | People's Action Party | Abdul Aziz bin Karim | Uncontested | ||||
| Kampong Chai Chee | 17,636 | People's Action Party | Sha'ari bin Tadin | Uncontested | ||||
| Kampong Glam | 9,484 | People's Action Party | S. Rajaratnam | Uncontested | ||||
| Kampong Kapor | 10,818 | People's Action Party | Lim Cheng Lock | Uncontested | ||||
| Kampong Kembangan | 15,862 | People's Action Party | Mohamed Ariff bin Suradi | Uncontested | ||||
| Kampong Ubi | 13,434 | People's Action Party | Ya'acob bin Mohamed | 9,797 | 81.87 | N/A | 63.74 | |
| Independent | Tay Mook Yong | 2,169 | 18.13 | N/A | ||||
| Katong | 14,872 | People's Action Party | Joseph Francis De Conceicao | Uncontested | ||||
| Kreta Ayer | 11,575 | People's Action Party | Goh Keng Swee | Uncontested | ||||
| MacPherson | 13,099 | People's Action Party | Chua Sian Chin | Uncontested | ||||
| Moulmein | 11,888 | People's Action Party | Lawrence Sia | 9,675 | 90.56 | 71.12 | ||
| Independent | T. T. Joseph | 1,009 | 9.44 | N/A | ||||
| Mountbatten | 12,760 | People's Action Party | Ng Yeow Chong | Uncontested | ||||
| Nee Soon | 12,846 | People's Action Party | Ong Soo Chuan | 10,442 | 91.35 | 82.70 | ||
| Workers' Party | Wong Hong Toy | 989 | 8.65 | N/A | ||||
| Pasir Panjang | 12,394 | People's Action Party | Othman Wok | Uncontested | ||||
| Paya Lebar | 17,573 | People's Action Party | Tay Boon Too | Uncontested | ||||
| Potong Pasir | 11,782 | People's Action Party | Sellappa Ramaswamy | Uncontested | ||||
| Punggol | 12,277 | People's Action Party | Ng Kah Ting | Uncontested | ||||
| Queenstown | 16,193 | People's Action Party | Jek Yeun Thong | Uncontested | ||||
| River Valley | 10,865 | People's Action Party | Low Guan Onn | Uncontested | ||||
| Rochore | 12,222 | People's Action Party | Toh Chin Chye | Uncontested | ||||
| Sembawang | 11,220 | People's Action Party | Teong Eng Siong | Uncontested | ||||
| Sepoy Lines | 11,409 | People's Action Party | Wee Toon Boon | Uncontested | ||||
| Serangoon Gardens | 9,454 | People's Action Party | Leonard Peter Rodrigo | Uncontested | ||||
| Siglap | 11,627 | People's Action Party | Abdul Rahim Ishak | Uncontested | ||||
| Stamford | 9,919 | People's Action Party | Fong Sip Chee | Uncontested | ||||
| Tampines | 12,703 | People's Action Party | Phua Bah Lee | Uncontested | ||||
| Tanglin | 13,332 | People's Action Party | E. W. Barker | Uncontested | ||||
| Tanjong Pagar | 10,806 | People's Action Party | Lee Kuan Yew | 9,128 | 94.34 | 88.68 | ||
| Independent | Rengaswamy Vetrivelu | 548 | 5.66 | N/A | ||||
| Telok Ayer | 11,721 | People's Action Party | Ong Pang Boon | Uncontested | ||||
| Telok Blangah | 14,785 | People's Action Party | N. Naidu Govindasamy | Uncontested | ||||
| Thomson | 15,911 | People's Action Party | Ang Nam Piau | Uncontested | ||||
| Tiong Bahru | 16,532 | People's Action Party | Ch'ng Jit Koon | Uncontested | ||||
| Toa Payoh | 19,143 | People's Action Party | Eric Cheong Yuen Chee | Uncontested | ||||
| Ulu Pandan | 13,289 | People's Action Party | Lee Teck Him | Uncontested | ||||
| Upper Serangoon | 13,373 | People's Action Party | Sia Kah Hui | Uncontested | ||||
| Whampoa | 12,854 | People's Action Party | Buang bin Omar Junid | Uncontested | ||||
| Source: ELD | ||||||||
Aftermath

The aftermath of the election entrenched the PAP's dominance in Singapore's political sphere. With the main opposition parties including the Barisan Sosialis (BS) staging a boycott, the PAP secured all 58 seats in Parliament, effectively establishing a one-party legislature. This absence of electoral competition enabled the government to advance its policy agenda without parliamentary resistance, reinforcing its mandate to pursue rapid industrialisation, economic restructuring and a model of governance characterised by anocratic tendencies.[7]
The opposition boycott had lasting ramifications for the political landscape. It precipitated the effective collapse of BS as a credible opposition force, with many of its leaders either detained or in exile. Despite attempts to re-enter the political arena in subsequent elections such as in 1972, the party never regained its former prominence. The absence of a viable opposition in Parliament diminished institutional checks and balances and weakened political accountability. Nevertheless, the PAP portrayed the boycott as a dereliction of democratic duty, framing it as evidence of the opposition's lack of resolve and as validation of its own claim to legitimate national leadership.[8]
Legacy
In the years following the election, the PAP leveraged its overwhelming mandate to consolidate efforts in national development and state-building. In pursuit of multiracialism, the government initiated policies such as ethnic integration in public housing to ensure social harmony across diverse communities. Economically, it intensified industrialisation by empowering the Economic Development Board (EDB) to further expand areas like Jurong, transforming them into industrial hubs. To reinforce social cohesion and cultivate a disciplined citizenry, the government introduced National Service (NS) and established a nationwide education system that promoted bilingualism and emphasised civic virtues.[9][10][11]
These programmes were implemented with minimal resistance, enabling rapid and comprehensive transformation of Singapore into a cohesive, stable and economically vibrant city-state. However, this period of accelerated modernisation also entailed the centralisation of authority, leading to criticism that the government had curtailed political pluralism and limited civic space. A key moment in this consolidation occurred in July 1968, when the PAP unanimously passed the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act to curtail the labour movement of Singapore. This legislation curtailed the powers of trade unions by restricting the right to strike, narrowing the scope of collective bargaining and introducing compulsory arbitration in industrial disputes. These reforms diminished the autonomy of independent unions and reinforced the authority of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), which maintains close institutional ties with the PAP to this day.[12]
While the nation experienced sustained economic growth and political stability, these developments came alongside the emergence of Singapore as a de facto one-party state. Opposition parties were not formally banned, yet they functioned under significant institutional and legal constraints. These included the extensive use of defamation lawsuits, the control of mainstream media and reliance on security legislation such as the Internal Security Act (ISA). While political dissent was not completely eliminated, it was confined within tightly regulated limits. The 1968 election marked a pivotal moment in Singapore's political development, entrenching a model of governance by the PAP that has been characterised by technocratic elitism and constrained electoral competition, although non-PAP parties would gradually re-emerge in the political sphere in subsequent decades.[7]
Notes
References
Citations
- ^ Dieter Nohlen, Florian Grotz & Christof Hartmann (2001) Elections in Asia: A data handbook, Volume II, p254 ISBN 0-19-924959-8
- ^ Drysdale, John (1984). Singapore: Struggle for Success. Times Books International. pp. 293–294.
- ^ Chua, Beng Huat (1995). Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. Routledge. pp. 42–43.
- ^ Plebeian (newspaper of the Barisan Socialis), 8 October 1966
- ^ Hussin Mutalib (2003). Parties and Politics: A Study of Opposition Parties and the PAP in Singapore. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press. pp. 70, 106–107. ISBN 981-210-211-6.
- ^ "1968 Parliamentary General Election". www.nlb.gov.sg. 2014.
- ^ a b Mauzy, Diane K.; Milne, R.S. (2002). Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party. Routledge. ISBN 9780415246538.
- ^ Rodan, Garry (1989). The Political Economy of Singapore's Industrialization: National State and International Capital. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780333470794.
- ^ Huff, W. G. (1994). The Economic Growth of Singapore: Trade and Development in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511470714.
- ^ Barr, Michael D.; Skrbiš, Zlatko (2008). Constructing Singapore: Elitism, Ethnicity and the Nation-Building Project. NIAS Press. ISBN 9788776940294.
- ^ Chua, Beng Huat (1995). Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. Routledge. ISBN 9780415164658.
- ^ "Industrial Relations (Amendment) Bill". sso.agc.gov.sg. Statues of the Republic of Singapore. 13 July 1968. Archived from the original on 20 October 2020. Retrieved 29 June 2025.
Sources
- MacDougall, John (March 1972). "The People's Action Party of Singapore: Emergence of a Dominant Party System. By Thomas J. Bellows. Yale University Southeast Asia Studies, Monograph Series No. 14, New Haven, 1970. Pp. xi + 195. Foreword, Preface, Notes, Bibliography and Appendices. Price US$5.75". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 3 (1): 144–146. doi:10.1017/S0022463400000837. ISSN 0022-4634.
- Ong, Elvin (2022). "Opposing Power: Building Opposition Alliances in Electoral Autocracies". University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.12001520. ISBN 978-0-472-03888-6. JSTOR 10.3998/mpub.12001520.
- Tan, Kevin (2015). The Constitution of Singapore: A Contextual Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 9781782258094. Retrieved 13 May 2025.
.jpg)


