Battle of Muye

Battle of Muye
牧野之戰
Datec. 1046 BC[b]
Location
Muye (in present-day central Henan)
Result
  • Zhou victory
Belligerents
Shang Zhou
Yong (庸)
Shu (蜀)
Qiang (羌)
Mao (髳)
Wei (微)
Lu (盧)
Peng (彭)
Pu (濮)[1][a]
Commanders and leaders
Di Xin †
Strength
50,000–70,000 troops
  • 45,000 footmen
  • 3,000 elites
  • 300 chariots
  • 3,700 allied chariots
Casualties and losses
Heavy
Battle of Muye
Traditional Chinese牧野之戰
Hanyu PinyinMùyě zhī zhàn
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinMùyě zhī zhàn
Wade–GilesMu-yeh chih chan

The Battle of Muye, Mu, or Muh (c. 1046 BC)[b][c] was fought between forces of the ancient Chinese Shang dynasty led by Di Xin and the rebel state of Zhou led by King Wu. The Zhou defeated the Shang at Muye and captured the Shang capital Yin, marking the end of the Shang and the establishment of the Zhou dynasty—an event that features prominently in Chinese historiography as an example of the Mandate of Heaven theory that functioned to justify dynastic conquest throughout Chinese history.

Background

The background to the Battle of Muye is murky, as much of the history is written from the perspectives of the prevailing Western Zhou dynasty and subsequent rulers. As centuries went on, narratives about the battle, particularly around the attitudes towards Di Xin, became progressively more vitriolic, and would embellish the details. Therefore, a neutral account is difficult to produce.[2][3]

By the 12th century BC, Shang influence extended west to the Wei River valley, a region that was occupied by clans known as the Predynastic Zhou. King Wen of Zhou, the ruler of the Zhou and vassal of the Shang king, was given the title "Overlord of the West"[4] by Di Xin, then-ruler of Shang.[d] As an ally state, King Wen and the Predynastic Zhou would guard Shang's rear while Di Xin was involved in campaigns to the east, particularly against the Renfang 人方, Linfang 林方, and Hufang 虎方.[5] These wars were costly to the Shang and drained their resources.[6] King Wen's performance as "Overlord of the West" was admirable, and so he was made one of Di Xin's "Three Dukes," along with Marquesses Jiu and E.[7]

At some point, Di Xin allegedly killed the daughter of Marquess Jiu who had been gifted to him, and then minced the Marquess himself, and then the Marquess of E. King Wen of Zhou learned of this and let out a sigh. An individual named Chong Houhu, lord of Chong, told Di Xin of the sigh, which led to King Wen's imprisonment. Although Wen was later released, the tension between Shang and Zhou grew. Wen prepared his army and conquered a few smaller states which were loyal to Shang, slowly weakening Shang allies. However, King Wen died in 1050 BC before Zhou's actual offensive against Shang, leaving King Wu of Zhou to continue his legacy. Despite reports of the conquests in the Wei River valley and depleting power, Di Xin was unconcerned about Zhou's progress, as he allegedly believed his rule was secured by the Mandate of Heaven.[7]

King Wen's son King Wu of Zhou led the Zhou in a revolt a few years after King Wen's death. The reason for this delay was that King Wu believed that the heavenly order to conquer Shang had not been given as he approached the Mengjin ford, as well as the advice of Jiang Ziya to wait for the right opportunity.[7] There was also an account of two boys, Boyi and Shuqi, who would go on a hunger strike in protest of the battle until their deaths.[8][9]

Sentiment towards Di Xin

19th Century depiction of Di Xin in Ehon Sangoku Yōfuden.

Contemporary sentiment towards Di Xin is difficult to gauge, but was seen as a significant contributing factor to the Zhou conquest of Shang for a significant length of time. Subsequent histories were politically and culturally aligned with the conquering Zhou, and historical accounts of Di Xin grew more egregious over time. In earlier sources, he is depicted as benighted and ineffectual; whereas after a few centuries, he is described as a monstrous torturer, universally despised.[10][2][3] For example, in Records of the Grand Historian, he is described as overindulging in alcohol and sex with his consort Daji, torture dissidents, and slowly abandon feng (豊), the Shang conception of ancestor veneration.[7][11]

However, these charges made by the Zhou are not reflected in contemporary evidence, and later scholars, such as Wang Chong[12] and Luo Mi[13], dispute these claims. Daji, the villainous consort alleged to have convinced Di Xin to conduct his wicked deeds,[7] is not seen in oracle bone evidence. The oracle bone evidence from Di Xin's period that is extant demonstrates sacrifices made towards Di Yi and other ancestors, and the rewarding of citizens for participating in ritual like any other ruler.[14][15][16] However, it is noted that ritual practice under Di Xin had become more centralised, which could be a source of tension.[17][18] Therefore, whether the rebellion against the Shang was due to Di Xin's attitude is unclear at best.

Battle

With just 45,000 men and a few hundred wagons, the Zhou were initially hugely outnumbered – even though most of the Shang forces were at war to the east, Di Xin organized some 170,000 troops. However, many of Di Xin's fighters were allegedly slaves, and he thought that despite low troop morale, his army's superior numbers could, if not defeat, then at least slow down the rebels until reinforcements could arrive. He was wrong. The majority of his Shang troops fled or joined the Zhou, and the few who did not were easily overwhelmed by the Zhou forces.[19][20][21]

Still, many loyal Shang troops fought on, and a very bloody battle followed, depicted at the end of a poem in the Shijing:

The troops of Yin-Shang,
Were collected like a forest,
And marshaled in the wilderness of Muh.
...
The wilderness of Muh spread out extensively;
Bright shone the chariots of sandal;
The teams of bays, black-maned and white-bellied, galloped along;
The grand-master Shang-foo,
Was like an eagle on the wing,
Assisting king Woo,
Who at one onset smote the great Shang.

— James Legge (translation), in Da ming (大明, "Great brightness", poem #236), Shijing[e]

The Zhou troops were much better trained, and their morale was high. In one of the chariot charges, King Wu broke through the Shang's defense line. Di Xin was forced to flee to his palace, and the remaining Shang troops fell into further chaos. The Zhou were victorious and showed little mercy to the defeated Shang, shedding enough blood "to float a log".[7]

The Yi Zhou Shu, which has had fragments excavated in the past century, portrays the conquest of Shang in a noticeably more brutal light than other narratives, noting that King Wu took prisoners and massacred civilians as he entered Yin, and killed Di Xin with an axe. It was condemned by scholars such as Mencius for a significant length of time. The prose is noticeably corrupted, with the Book of Han occasionally quoting it with different prose. Regardless, it has seen recent attention in scholarship given its relatively stable narrative compared to many received texts.[26]

Aftermath

The traditional narrative of the aftermath of the battle tells of Di Xin gathering his treasures, ascending to the Deer Terrace Pavilion, and burning it with himself inside, committing suicide.[23][27] King Wu killed Daji after he found her on the order of Jiang Ziya, wherein her head, along with Di Xin's, was placed on a pike. King Wu then paid respects to Bi Gan, who had allegedly been killed by Di Xin before the war, as well as Shangrong (商容).[7] Shang officials were released without charge with some later working as Zhou officials. The imperial grain store was opened immediately after the battle to feed the starving population. The battle marked the end of the Shang dynasty and the beginning of the Zhou dynasty.

After the conquest, oracle bone evidence shows King Wu requesting Wu Geng's presence,[28] and classical texts tell of him being allowed to continue the Shang state religion within Yin for a time, before Weizi Qi was enfeoffed with the state of Song. King Wu would enfeoff three relatives; Shu Xian of Guan, Shu Du of Cai, and Shu Chu of Huo, who would become the "Three Guards," who would cut off Shang from access to support from the Dongyi and no longer harm rival tribes.[7] However, upon King Wu's death, Wu Geng would cooperate with the three brothers to mount the Rebellion of the Three Guards against the Duke of Zhou, who took regency during the reign of King Cheng of Zhou, fearing him as a usurper and believing Wu Geng should be the regent instead.[29]

Dating

Although the day and month on which the Battle of Muye was fought are certain, there is doubt about the year.[30] Prior to the Xia–Shang–Zhou Chronology Project, previous chronologies had proposed at least 44 different dates for this event, ranging from 1130 to 1018 BC.[31][32] The most popular had been 1122 BC, calculated by the Han dynasty astronomer Liu Xin, and 1027 BC, deduced from a statement in the "old text" Bamboo Annals that the Western Zhou (whose endpoint is known to be 770 BC) had lasted 257 years.[33][34]

A few documents relate astronomical observations to this event:

  • A quotation in the Book of Han from the lost Wǔchéng 武成 chapter of the Book of Documents appears to describe a lunar eclipse just before the beginning of King Wu's campaign. This date, and the date of his victory, are given as months and sexagenary days.[35][36]
  • A passage in the Guoyu gives the positions of the Sun, Moon, Jupiter, and two stars on the day King Wu attacked the Shang.[34][36]
  • The "current text" Bamboo Annals mentions conjunctions of all five planets occurring before and after the Zhou conquest. Han-period texts mention the first conjunction as occurring in the 32nd year of the reign of the last king. Such events are rare, but all five planets did gather on 28 May 1059 BC and again on 26 September 1019 BC. Although the recorded positions in the sky of these two events are the reverse of what occurred, they could not have been retrospectively calculated at the time the account first appears.[37]

The strategy adopted by the Project was to use the archaeological investigation to narrow the range of dates that would need to be compared with the astronomical data. Although no archaeological traces of King Wu's campaign have been found, the pre-conquest Zhou capital at Fengxi in Shaanxi has been excavated and strata at the site have been identified with the pre-dynastic Zhou. Radiocarbon dating of samples from the site as well as at late Yinxu and early Zhou capitals, using the wiggle matching technique, yielded a date for the conquest between 1050 and 1020 BC. The only date within that range matching all the astronomical data is 20 January 1046 BC. This date had previously been proposed by David Pankenier, who had matched the above passages from the classics with the same astronomical events, but here it resulted from a thorough consideration of a broader range of evidence.[38][39][40]

Other scholars have raised several criticisms of this process. The connection between the layers at the archaeological sites and the conquest is uncertain.[41] The narrow range of radiocarbon dates is cited with a less stringent confidence interval (68%) than the standard requirement of 95%, which would have produced a much wider range.[42] The texts describing the relevant astronomical phenomena are extremely obscure.[43][44] For example, the inscription on the Li gui, a key text used in dating the conquest, can be interpreted in several different ways, with one alternative reading leading to the date of 9 January 1044 BC.[34]

Archaeology

Archaeology has revealed that Yin had no border walls, unlike other, older Shang strongholds such as Huanbei.[45] This is likely because of the Huan River flowing nearby, creating a natural moat defense against attack,[46] and the lack of walls would lend to chariot-based offensives.[47][48]

Despite the findings at Yin and the historicity a "final battle" being clear, the location of "Muye" at the time of the offensive is unclear, and the remains of the battle have failed to materialise in excavations. Zhaoge has also not been found, and could simply be another area of Yin.[49] Sun Yingmin (孙英民), President of the Henan Provincial Society of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, believes that the Mengzhuang archaeological site could be the site of the Battle of Muye. This is for three reasons: It is close in proximity to the ruins of Yin, appears to have maintained a long-standing culture, and has some remains reminiscent of the Erligang culture, associated with the Late Shang culture.[50] However, this hypothesis has not been fully explored.

See also

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ The given date in this chapter of the Book of Documents matches that of the Li gui.
  2. ^ a b 1046 BC is the year endorsed by the Xia–Shang–Zhou Chronology Project, though doubts persist on this dating. See § Dating.
  3. ^ literally, "Battle of the Wild Pasture"
  4. ^ The Shang monarch's name is recorded as "Di Xin" (帝辛, "God-King Xin") in Shang records. Zhou records call him by many names, using his posthumous perjorative epithet "Zhou" (紂). These include "Zhouxin", "Zhou of Shang", "Zhou of Yin" (his capital city), and "Shang King Zhou". This name "Zhòu" is an entirely different word to the Zhōu dynasty that conquered him (周), despite their identical romanization when tone marks are ignored.
  5. ^ The final words of this poem, "會朝清明", do not have an agreed-upon meaning, even accounting for poetic variation. Legge (1871) has "That morning's encounter was followed by a clear bright [day]."[22] Shaughnessy (1999) and Chen (2021) give "Meeting in the morning, clear and bright."[23][24] Nivison (2018) reads the final two words as a date term, yielding "this occurred in the morning, Qingming [Day]".[25]

Citations

  1. ^ Fu, Sheng. "牧誓". In Sturgeon, Donald (ed.). 尚書 [Book of Documents] (in Literary Chinese). Chinese Text Project. Retrieved 13 April 2026. 時甲子昧爽，王朝至于商郊牧野，乃誓。王左杖黃鉞，右秉白旄以麾，曰：「逖矣，西土之人！」王曰：「嗟！我友邦冢君、御事、司徒、司馬、司空，亞旅、師氏，千夫長、百夫長，及庸，蜀、羌、髳、微、盧、彭、濮人。稱爾戈，比爾干，立爾矛，予其誓。」王曰：「古人有言曰：『牝雞無晨；牝雞之晨，惟家之索。』今商王受惟婦言是用，昏棄厥肆祀弗答，昏棄厥遺王父母弟不迪，乃惟四方之多罪逋逃，是崇是長，是信是使，是以為大夫卿士。俾暴虐于百姓，以奸宄于商邑。今予發惟恭行天之罰。今日之事，不愆于六步、七步，乃止齊焉。勖哉夫子！不愆于四伐、五伐、六伐、七伐，乃止齊焉。勖哉夫子！尚桓桓如虎、如貔、如熊、如羆，于商郊弗迓克奔，以役西土，勖哉夫子！爾所弗勖，其于爾躬有戮！」
  2. ^ a b 徐明波, 彭裕商. 殷墟黄组卜辞断代研究[J]. 中国史研究, 2007(2):13.
  3. ^ a b 江雨德《国之大事：商代晚期中的礼制改良》，唐际根主编《殷墟与商文化(殷墟科学发掘80周年纪念文集)》，科学出版社，2011年11月
  4. ^ Pines (2020), p. 717.
  5. ^ 集成 Jicheng 02752: 隹（唯）王令南宮伐反虎方之年，王令中先省南或（國），貫行，[]木土丮[]（埶）王厂[]立，在夔虖真山，中乎（呼）歸生鳳于王，木土丮[]（埶）于寶彝。
  6. ^ 《左传·昭公十一年》：“桀克有缗以丧其国，纣克东夷而陨其身。”
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h Sima, Qian. "殷本紀". 史記 [Records of the Grand Historian] (in Literary Chinese). Chinese Text Project. Retrieved 11 April 2026.
  8. ^ Sima, Qian. "伯夷列傳". 史記 [Records of the Grand Historian] (in Literary Chinese). Chinese Text Project. Retrieved 11 April 2026.
  9. ^ Hawkes, David, translator and introduction (2011 [1985]). Qu Yuan et al., The Songs of the South: An Ancient Chinese Anthology of Poems by Qu Yuan and Other Poets. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-044375-2
  10. ^ Pines (2008), pp. 3–4, 10, 12.
  11. ^ Xinsheng, Hu (2023). "The Characteristics of Rituals and Their Imprint on Chinese Culture". Journal of Chinese Humanities. 9 (3): 247–263. doi:10.1163/23521341-12340156.
  12. ^ 王充《论衡·语增》: 令池在深室之中，则三千人宜临池坐，前俛饮池酒，仰食肴膳，倡乐在前，乃为乐耳。如审临池而坐，则前饮害于肴膳，倡乐之作不得在前。夫饮食既不以礼，临池牛饮，则其啖肴不复用杯，亦宜就鱼肉而虎食。则知夫酒池牛饮非其实也。
  13. ^ （南宋）罗泌《路史》，北京图书馆出版社，2003年
  14. ^ 集成 Jicheng 05413
  15. ^ NA 1566
  16. ^ 张超俊. "活在历史里的中国犀牛". 中华遗产 2009年第07期. Archived from the original on 2016-10-04. Retrieved 2016-10-01.
  17. ^ Dong 董, Zuobin 作宾 (1933). 甲骨文斷代研究例.
  18. ^ Shaughnessy, Edward L (1982). "Recent Approaches to Oracle-Bone Periodization: A Review". Early China. 8: 1–13. doi:10.1017/S0362502800005411.
  19. ^ Kevin M. McGeough (2011-03-23). "The Zhou Conquest of the Shang and the Consolidation of Empire". In Alfred J. Andrea (ed.). World History Encyclopedia. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. pp. 570–571. ISBN 978-1-85109-930-6.
  20. ^ Li, Xiaobing (2012-01-10). China at War: An Encyclopedia. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-59884-416-0.
  21. ^ Grant, R. G. (2017-10-24). 1001 Battles That Changed the Course of History. Book Sales. ISBN 978-0-7858-3553-0.
  22. ^ Legge (1871), p. 436.
  23. ^ a b Shaughnessy (1999), p. 310.
  24. ^ Chen (2021), p. 181.
  25. ^ Nivison (2018), p. 113.
  26. ^ Yegor Grebnev, (2018). "The Record of King Wu of Zhou's Royal Deeds in the Yi Zhou Shu in Light of Near Eastern Royal Inscriptions," Journal of the American Oriental Society 138.1, p. 73-104.
  27. ^ Grebnev (2018), pp. 86–87.
  28. ^ Lu 路, Guoquan 国权; Wang 王, Junmei 君美 (2010). "甲骨文、金文新释两则". 复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心版.
  29. ^ Shaughnessy, Edward L. (2006). The Cambridge history of ancient China: from the origins of civilization to 221 B.C (Repr ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 9780521470308.
  30. ^ Wu (1982), p 319 n 40, p 320 n 41.
  31. ^ Yin (2002), p. 1.
  32. ^ Lee (2002), p. 32.
  33. ^ Pankenier (1982), p. 3.
  34. ^ a b c Lee (2002), p. 34.
  35. ^ Lee (2002), pp. 33–34.
  36. ^ a b Liu (2002), p. 4.
  37. ^ Zhang (2002), p. 350.
  38. ^ Lee (2002), pp. 31–34.
  39. ^ Yin (2002), pp. 2–3.
  40. ^ Pankenier (1982), pp. 3–7.
  41. ^ Lee (2002), p. 36.
  42. ^ Keenan (2007), p. 147.
  43. ^ Keenan (2002), pp. 62–64.
  44. ^ Stephenson (2008), pp. 231–242.
  45. ^ Haicheng, Wang (12 March 2015). "Writing and the city in early China". The Cambridge World History: 131–157. doi:10.1017/CHO9781139035606.010. ISBN 978-1-139-03560-6.
  46. ^ Wang, Yin; Qin, Zhen; Hou, Weidong; Storozum, Michael (29 June 2022). "Water Conservancy System and Urban Layout of Yinxu, the Capital City of Shang: A GIS Approach". Land. 11 (7): 986. Bibcode:2022Land...11..986W. doi:10.3390/land11070986.
  47. ^ Rawson, Jessica; Chugunov, Konstantin; Grebnev, Yegor; Huan, Limin (June 2020). "Chariotry and Prone Burials: Reassessing Late Shang China's Relationship with Its Northern Neighbours". Journal of World Prehistory. 33 (2): 135–168. doi:10.1007/s10963-020-09142-4.
  48. ^ Barbieri-Low, Anthony J. (2000). "Wheeled Vehicles in the Chinese Bronze Age (c. 2000–741 B.C.)" (PDF). Sino-Platonic Papers (99). Retrieved 15 April 2026.
  49. ^ Wang 王, Xudong 旭東 (2022). "〈世俘〉、牆盤與牧野戰後的武王東征". 漢學研究. 40 (4): 1–32. ISSN 0254-4466.
  50. ^ "辉县孟庄城址发现30周年座谈会暨考古遗址公园建设专家咨询会会议纪要". 河南省文物考古研究院. 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2026.

Sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.